Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

816 F.2d 671

Docket No. 86-7721.

Crawford v. Packard

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 24, 1987. Decided April 13, 1987.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-04-13

Relies on Finch v. Richardson

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1987-04-13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Before WIDENER, HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.

Curtis E. Crawford, appellant pro se.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec.l983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court.* Crawford v. Packard, C/A No. 86-2946-M (D.Md., Oct. 28, 1986).

¶2

AFFIRMED.

*We deny Crawford's "Motion of Discovery to have all prison's files entered in case".

/816/f2d/671 · .json · Public domain