Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 82 F.1d 550 - Peirce v. Clavin

Peirce v. Clavin’s Empirical Analysis

82 F. 550 · 1897

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 1916
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently January 1916

5 federal appellate ·

30189719001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Randall v. Baltimore O R · Dorsey v. Phillips & Colby Construction Co. · Miner v. Connecticut River Railroad · Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. Myers · Reed v. Stockmeyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The court below ignored wholly the doctrine of assumption of risk, and refused the instructions requested in that behalf, erroneously supposing that absolute knowledge of the defect which existed during the entire time of his service could not, under any circumstances, amount to an assumption of risk, but merely cast upon him greater care in the use, or in avoiding danger from the defective appliance. This is manifest error, for which we think the judgment must be reversed. The doctrine of assumption of risk is not to be confounded with the doctrine of contributory negligence; for, where the former doctrine is applicable, the servant may exercise the greatest care, and yet be precluded from recovery for an injury in the performance of his service, because fhe risk was assumed. Miner v. Railroad Co., 153 Mass. 398 , 26 N. E. 994 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.