82 N.J.L. 728
Decided June 26, 1911
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1911-06-26
<p>On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 51 Vroom 496.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1974
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1911-06-26
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Chief Justice in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance—The Chancellob, Gaeeison, Swayze, Bebgen, Vookhees, Kalisch, Bogeet, Ykedenbuegh, •Congdon, Sullivan, White, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal—None.