82 N.Y. Sup. Ct.
Volume 82 — New York Supreme Court Reports
21 opinions
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 35Jones v. Jones (1894)
<p>In an action ’brought for the specific performance of an implied contract on the part of the defendants, testamentary trustees, to convey land located in another State, which contract is claimed to have arisen upon the acceptance by the trustees of a certain legacy, interrogatories proposed to be propounded on behalf of the defendants, under a commission, to a lawyer of the State in which the land is situated, for the purpose of proving what the law of that State and the decisions of its courts are as to such an implied contract, are not so clearly frivolous as to call for their disallowance.</p>
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 114People v. Madison Square Bank (1894)
Money wrongfully received by a bank in part payment of a mortgage — when it must be turned over by the receiver of the bank to the holder of the mortgage.
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 129In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Perkins (1894)
Surrogate’s decree — made by a surrogate loithout jurisdiction, is no protection to an executor — jurisdiction to constr ue a will— Code Civ. Proo. § 2624 — when an executor is protected.
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 455Meagher v. Cooperstown & Charlotte Valley Railroad (1894)
Injury to a child — what constitutes negligence on thepcm't of the father or mother— what, on the pcwt of the railroad.
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 479Mundy v. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad (1894)
Damages for injury io real property — culvert traversing tlie overflow bed of a riverr — extraordinary flood — statute justifying an injury to private property — powers of a railroad corporation — allegation of a nuisance.
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 543Henney v. Brooklyn Elevated Railroad (1894)
Judgment enjoining the operation of an elevated railroad —when proper. Appeal by the defendants, The Brooklyn Elevated Railroad Company and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plain-tiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 27th. day of January, 1893, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the Kings County Special Term.
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 556Tuthill v. Long Island Railroad (1894)
Change of venue for the convenience of witnesses — considerations other than the number of witnesses.
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612Brown v. Chautauqua County National Bank (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612In re the Settlement of the Account of the Administrator of Daggett (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612Parker v. Webster (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612Clark v. Clark (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612Reynolds v. Sisson (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613Clay v. Hayes (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613Hickman v. Purviance (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613Lester v. Wright (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613McArthur v. Cameron (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. Palmer (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613In re Mayhew (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613In re the Accounting of Smedley (1894)
- 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 613Washbon v. Winton (1894)