Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

825 A.2d 629

Commonwealth v. Mack

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2003

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2003-06-05

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-06-05

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2026 · most notably 2005 Pa. Super. 45 - Grossman v. Barke (2005), Goldblum v. Klem (2007)

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

180200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM. _

¶2AND NOW, this 5th day of June, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED in part, but LIMITED to the issue of whether trial counsel was ineffective by failing to file a motion to suppress the evidence found in the second search of Michelle Wilkinson’s vehicle and in failing to object to that evidence being introduced into evidence. See “Statement Pursuant to Rule 1925(b) of Appellate Procedure,” p. 3, para. 2a. The matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration and determination of this is*630sue. In all other respects, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.

/825/a2d/629 · .json · Public domain