Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 F.2d 1004 - Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools

Kitchen v. Chippewa Valley Schools’s Empirical Analysis

825 F.2d 1004 · 1987

Citation profile

162
cited by 162 later decisions
1
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

100 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 162 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co. (1989), Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp. (1995)

100 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

97019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · United States v. United States Gypsum Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 162 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “as a whole in order to determine whether they adequately inform the jury of the relevant considerations and provide a basis in law for aiding the jury in reaching its decision.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “if there is a complete absence of pleading or proof on an issue or issues material to the cause of action or where there are no controversial issues of fact upon which reasonable men could differ.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “viewed as a whole, were confusing, misleading and prejudicial.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.