Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 825 SO2D 527 - Murray v. Schreiner

Murray v. Schreiner’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 475 So. 2d 666 - Moore v. Morris · 174 So. 2d 26 - Gulle v. Boggs · 104 So. 2d 785 - McNulty v. Cusack · Waters v. Williams · 430 So. 2d 562 - Munceas v. Harris

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether the ultimate fact has been established must then be decided by the jury from all of the evidence before it without the aid of the presumption.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`When the defendant produces evidence which fairly and reasonably tends to show that the real fact is not as presumed, the impact of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.