Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

826 So. 2d 396

Docket No. 1D01-3527.

Isaac v. State

Lemuel E. ISAAC, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 23, 2002.

Rehearing Denied September 20, 2002.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2002-07-23

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2011

5 state decisions

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Caraballo v. State · 803 So. 2d 821 - McCloud v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-07-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Anne C. Toolan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The trial court's denial of the appellant's motion to correct sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(1) is AFFIRMED. The rule of Apprendi v. New Jersey,530 U.S. 466. 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), does not apply when the sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum permitted by section 775.082, Florida Statutes. See Lee v. State,808 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); McCloud v. State,803 So.2d 821 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Caraballo v. State,805 So.2d 882 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Gilson v. State795 So.2d 105 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001).

¶5BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

/826/so2d/396 · .json · Public domain