Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

828 F.2d 1445

Docket No. 85-2125.

Allen v. Scribner

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 29, 1987.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-09-29

3 counsel of record

Relies on Bart v. Telford · Allen v. Scribner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-09-29

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably Soranno's Gasco, Inc. v. Morgan (1989), Allen v. Scribner (1987)

48 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

43019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stanley G. Hilton, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant.

¶2Michael S. Sorgen, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

¶3George Chris Stoll, San Francisco, Cal., Susan R. Oie, Sacramento, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

¶4Before NELSON, CANBY and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

¶5ORDER

¶6The opinion 812 F.2d 426 (9th Cir.1987), filed March 5, 1987, is hereby amended as follows:

(1) Page 429, col. 1, lines 36-37:
Under the heading “(i),” “all of the state defendants,” is replaced with “state defendants Scribner, Hans Van Nes, Richard Rominger, and Robert Dowell.”
(2) Page 429, col. 2, line 5:
The semicolon following “1981” is replaced with a period. The phrase “and (iv)” is deleted and replaced with: “In his affidavit, Allen also alleges that.”
(3) Page 434, footnote 17:
In the parenthetical following the citation to Bart v. Telford, 677 F.2d 622, 625 (7th Cir.1982),” the words “summary judgment” are changed to “motion to dismiss.”
/828/f2d/1445 · .json · Public domain