Kelly v. Springfield Ry. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
83 F. 183 · 1897
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 1964
4 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wooster v. Handy · Hughes · Branfoot v. Hamilton · Cornelly v. Markwald · Atwood v. Jaques
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Another exception is the disallowance of the fee paid for a copy of the testimony taken de bene esse. By consent counsel on both sides were allowed to obtain a copy of the testimony taken in New York. Properly this is no part of the costs of the case. The copies were solely for the convenience of counsel. In the absence of any agreement that it should be included in the costs, that cannot be done. Counsel for the plaintiffs deny that there was any such agreement, and no stipulation in writing to that effect is in the record. The exception is overruled.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stallo v. Wagner““In no case is the printing of the record and of briefs a taxable cost, except where there is a rule of court requiring the same to be printed, or where there is a stipulation to the same effect.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““The expense of copies of testimony is not taxable as part of the costs in this district.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Stallo v. Wagner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.