Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 83 F.2d 807 - Weber v. Texas Co.

Weber v. Texas Co.’s Empirical Analysis

83 F.2d 807 · 1936

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
18
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably Ferrero Construction Co. v. Dennis Rourke Corp. (1988), Beets v. Tyler (1956)

30 state decisions — followed in 18 states

100193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sheffield v. Hogg · White v. McGregor · Barton v. Thaw · Sheffield v. Hogg · Fogg v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The rule against perpetuities springs from considerations of public policy. The underlying reason for and purpose of the rule is to avoid fettering real property with future interests dependent upon contingencies unduly remote which isolate the property and exclude it from commerce and development for long periods of time, thus working an indirect restraint upon alienation, which is regarded at common law as a public evil. [Citations.] "The option under consideration is within neither the purpose of nor the reason for the rule. This is not an exclusive option to the lessee to buy at a fixed price which may be exercised at some remote time beyond the limit of the rule against perpetuities, meanwhile forestalling alienation. The option simply gives the lessee the prior right to take the lessor's royalty interest at the same price the lessor could secure from another purchaser whenever the lessor desires to sell. It amounts to no more than a continuing and preferred right to buy at the market price whenever the lessor desires to sell. This does not restrain free alienation by the lessor. He may sell at any time, but must afford the lessee the prior right to buy. The lessee cannot prevent a sale. His sole right is to accept or reject as a preferred purchaser when the lessor is ready to sell. The option is therefore not objectionable as a perpetuity." Weber v. Texas Co., supra, 83 F.2d at 808 .”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The lessee is hereby given the option of purchasing all or any part of said royalty rights from the lessor at the best bona fide price offered by responsible third parties when and if offered for sale or transfer by lessor.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'as long as either oil or gas is or can be produced from any well on said land”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.