83 N.J. Eq. 345
Decided May 4, 1914
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1914-05-04
<p>On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Baches, whose opinion is reported in 81 N. J. Eq. 459.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1914-05-04
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1950
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons' stated in the opinion died in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.
¶2■ For affirmance — The Chile-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Teenohard, Berg km, Minturn, EJaliscii, Bogert, Vredenbuegii, White, Hepplnheimer — 11.
¶3For mversal — None.