83 N.J.L. 636
Decided June 20, 1912
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1912-06-20
<p>On error to the Supreme Court, which affirmed a judgment of the Hudson County Sessions.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1957
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1912-06-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the cause by the Supreme Court.
¶2*639For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Swayze, Tbbnctiard, Bergen, Mtnturn, Kalisch, Bogert, Yeedenburgh, AOioom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 12.
¶3For reversal — A'one.