83 N.J.L. 792
Decided November 18, 1912
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1912-11-18
<p>On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 53 Vroom 227.</p>
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1957
7 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1912-11-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reason expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, VredenBURGH, CONGDON, WHITE, TREACY, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal — None.