¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisoh, Bogert, Vreden-BURGI-r, CONGDON, WHITE, TREAOY, JL 11.
¶3■ For reversal — None.