83 N.J.L. 801
Decided November 18, 1912
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1912-11-18
<p>On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 53 Vroom 181.</p>
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 1964
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1912-11-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed m the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
¶2Fot affirmance — Tim Chancellor, Garrison, Trenciiaud, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Bogert, VhbdenBURGH, CONGDON, WlTITE, TfiEACY, JJ. 11.
¶3For reversal — Fone.