83 Wash. 2d 70 - Clausing v. DeHart’s Empirical Analysis
1973
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably 109 Wash. 2d 107 - Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply System (1988), 110 Wash. 2d 415 - Hoffer v. State (1988)
9 federal appellate · 33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Young v. Higbee Co. · Fratt v. Robinson · Jack D. Matheson v. George Armbrust · 2 Wash. App. 845 - Shermer v. Baker · 70 Wash. 2d 438 - Sanwick v. Puget Sound Title Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is unlawful for any person, in connection with the offer, sale or purchase of any security, directly or indirectly: (1) To employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; (2) To make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they are made, not misleading; or (3) To engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“`is patterned after and restates in substantial part the language of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“'face-to-face' negotiations outside the security markets between private individuals for the sale of the capital stock of a corporation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.