United States v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis
830 F.2d 651 · 1987
Citation profile
27 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably State v. Smith (1988), United States v. Loy (2001)
27 federal appellate · 3 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3651 · 26 U.S.C. § 6012 · 26 U.S.C. § 7203 · 28 U.S.C. § 1918
Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Spies v. United States · Minnesota v. Murphy · Bearden v. Georgia · S.S. Zoe Colocotroni v. Puerto Rico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he court need only be 'reasonably satisfied' [that the conduct of the probationer has not been as good as required by the conditions of probation] and need not find by a preponderance of the evidence that a violation has occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a district court requires little evidence to find that a probationer has violated his probation conditions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“fair and appropriate even if the probationer did not willfully violate his probation conditions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.