Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

831 F.2d 222

Docket No. 86-3641.

Reshard v. Britt

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-10-06

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1997

5 federal appellate ·

5 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46

Relies on Reshard v. Britt

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Connie Reshard, pro se.

¶2Richard B. Collins, Collins, Dennis & Williams, Tallahassee, Fla., for Dr. Earl Britt.

¶3Richard Smoak, Sale, Brown & Smoak, Panama City, Fla., for Dr. George Bonk.

¶4P. Scott Mitchell, Fuller & Johnson, Tallahassee, Fla., for Dr. David Moore.

¶5William H. Davis, Wadsworth & Davis, Tallahassee, Fla., for Tallahassee Community Hosp.

¶6Before RONEY, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges *.

¶8ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING IN BANC

¶9BY THE COURT:

¶10A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing in banc and a majority of the judges of this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing in banc,

¶11IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court in banc without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of in banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

/831/f2d/222 · .json · Public domain