Marxe v. Cw Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.2d 1121 · 1987
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Frank's GMC Truck Center, Inc. v. General Motors Corp. (1988), Adams v. Freedom Forge Corp. (2000)
13 federal appellate · 7 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 39 U.S.C. § 3007 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Holmes v. United States · American Sterilizer Co. v. Sybron Corp. · Cochran v. United States · A. O. Smith Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1282. Inland Steel Company v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1283. Northwest Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1284. Oscar Mayer & Co. Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1285. Merck & Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1286. Hobart Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1287. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1288. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, in No. 75--1289 · Martin-Trigona v. Lavien
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have consistently held that our review of the grant or denial of preliminary injunctions is limited to determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion, an error of law, or a clear mistake in the consideration of the proof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“if a study of the record suggests the district court did not completely miss the mark in its conclusion that [the movant] is likely to succeed on the merits of her case, we must uphold the court's finding on that criterion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the grant or denial of a preliminary injunction is almost always based on an abbreviated set of facts, requiring a delicate balancing ... [that] is the responsibility of the district judge....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.