Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

833 F.2d 148

Docket No. 86-3085.

United States v. Gray

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Nov. 24, 1987.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1987-11-24

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1989

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on McCorquodale v. Kemp · United States v. Gray · 633 F. Supp. 1311 - United States v. Gray

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1987-11-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1G. Curtis Drake, Helena, Mont, for defendant-appellant.

¶2Byron H. Dunbar, U.S. Atty., and Carl E. Rostad, Asst. U.S. Atty., Great Falls, Mont., for plaintiff-appellee.

¶3ORDER

¶4Before ANDERSON, HUG and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

¶5By an order entered October 5, 1987, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 54, 98 L.Ed.2d 18, the United States Supreme Court vacated this court’s decision reported at 809 F.2d 579 and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Solicitor General’s position stated in his brief filed June 17, 1987.

¶6Upon reconsideration, this court’s opinion filed February 3, 1987, is VACATED. The decision of the district court reported at 633 F.Supp. 1311 is VACATED and the case is remanded to the district court with instructions to set aside the conviction and the jury verdict and to dismiss the Indictment.

/833/f2d/148 · .json · Public domain