Duncan v. Muzyn’s Empirical Analysis
833 F.3d 567 · 2016
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 831 (Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 703 · 5 U.S.C. § 704
Relies on Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Auer v. Robbins · Heckler v. Chaney · Christensen v. Harris County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to suspect that [TVARS's] interpretation [may] not reflect the agency's fair and considered judgment on the matter in question,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duncan v. Muzyn“amendments proposed by the board become effective only if the TVA does not exercise its veto within thirty days”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duncan v. Muzyn“significant ramifications for the TVA's funding responsibility.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Duncan v. Muzyn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.