¶1ORDER
¶2AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2003, the order of the Superior Court is reversed and the case is remanded to the PCRA court to consider whether appellant *505is entitled to file a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to this Court nunc pro tunc based upon his appellate counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness in failing to file a timely petition for allowance of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Liebel, 825 A.2d 630 (Pa. 2003). Jurisdiction is relinquished.