Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 834 F.2d 853 - Donald Eugene Harding v. Samuel A. Lewis

Donald Eugene Harding v. Samuel A. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

834 F.2d 853 · 1987

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
6
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

50 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably United States v. Swanson (1991), United States v. Olano (1995)

50 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

5901987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Drope v. Missouri · Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann · Johnson v. Righetti

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a good faith doubt as to the defendant's ability to understand the nature and consequences of the plea, or to participate intelligently in the proceedings and to make a reasoned choice among the alternatives presented.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “On review, the issue is what the defendant understood about the proceedings, including the possible consequences, and the dangers of acting as his own attorney.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “failure to engage the defendant in such a colloquy does not necessitate reversal ... if the record otherwise revels a knowing and intelligent waiver.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.