Green v. Skulute’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 10 U.S.C. § 832 · 10 U.S.C. § 869 · 10 U.S.C. § 876 · 10 U.S.C. § 933 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · United States v. Frady · Engle v. Isaac · Parker v. Levy · Burns v. Wilson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“10 In response to the complaint, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), with a supporting brief. Thereafter, Green filed a response to the motion to dismiss, supported by a memorandum of law. After hearing, the district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and dismissed Green's complaint”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Sklute“also must determine whether it is appropriate to exercise jurisdiction under the particular circumstances of this case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Sklute“level of a substantial constitutional issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Green v. Sklute
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.