84 N.J.L. 417
Decided April 24, 1913
Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1913-04-24
<p>On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 54 Vroom 172.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1956
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1913-04-24
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Voorhees in the Supreme Court.
¶2For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Trenchard, Bergen, Kaltscii, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Cong-don, JJ. 8.
¶3For reversal — Parker, Minturn, White, JJ. 3.