Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

840 So. 2d 369

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-03-13

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2013

4 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California · Walker v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-03-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Having reviewed the briefs, we agree that no reversible error occurred. We therefore affirm the appellant’s revocation of probation and imposition of the judgment and sentence. Because the record does not contain a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order, consistent with its oral pronouncement. See Walker v. State, 686 So.2d 758 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellant need not be present.

¶2AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.
/840/so2d/369 · .json · Public domain