Doe v. Reivitz

Decided March 22, 1988.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-03-22

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77D (§ 4 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77E (§ 5 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78D (§ 4a of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78O (§ 15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78Y (§ 25 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)

Relies on American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co. · Butz v. Glover Livestock Commission Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-03-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently September 2013

14 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Before WOOD and CUDAHY, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.

¶2ORDER

¶3The court, sua sponte, amends the opinion in the above-entitled cause, issued September 28, 1987, 830 F.2d 1441 (7th Cir.1987), by adding the following language to footnote 11 at page 1448 of the opinion:

After we issued our opinion in this case, we received a letter from plaintiffs’ counsel suggesting that some of the above-cited sections apply to the Wisconsin program since that program is not entirely a general WIN program. Neither the state nor the federal government, however, filed a petition for rehearing, and this portion of our statutory analysis remains applicable to the extent the program is a general WIN program. Further, nothing in the letter casts any doubt on the remainder of our analysis or on the result.