845 So. 2d 854 - Lowe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Armstrong v. State · 608 So. 2d 762 - Ex Parte State · 680 So. 2d 980 - Puckett v. State · 728 So. 2d 673 - Owens v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Comes now the defendant and her attorney and in open Court on this the 3rd day of September, 2003, and after hearing testimony of the defendant to show cause why her probation should not be revoked at this time, the Court finds that the defendant has violated the conditions of her probation as set forth in the Delinquent Charge(s) Number[s] One (1) and Two (2). "After due consideration, the Court finds that the defendant has violated the terms of her probation and it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED BY THE COURT that the defendant's probation be and hereby is REVOKED."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.