Johnson v. Interstate Management Co.’s Empirical Analysis
849 F.3d 1093 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 660 (§ 11 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Cort v. Ash · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Even if Johnson had produced sufficient evidence to dispute whether the infractions occurred, Johnson did not provide sufficient evidence to call into question whether hotel management ' honestly and reasonably believed ' that the infractions occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sagar v. Mnuchin“provide evidence that is sufficient for purposes of summary judgment to cast doubt on the adverse employment record established by the large volume of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sagar v. Mnuchin“was not the actual reason and that the employer intentionally discriminated against the employee on the basis of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sagar v. Mnuchin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.