Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 849 F.3d 1093 - Johnson v. Interstate Management Co.

Johnson v. Interstate Management Co.’s Empirical Analysis

849 F.3d 1093 · 2017

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
June 2020
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 626 (§ 7 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 660 (§ 11 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970) · 42 U.S.C. § 12203 (§ 503 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Cort v. Ash · Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Russell · Touche Ross & Co. v. Redington · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if Johnson had produced sufficient evidence to dispute whether the infractions occurred, Johnson did not provide sufficient evidence to call into question whether hotel management ' honestly and reasonably believed ' that the infractions occurred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “provide evidence that is sufficient for purposes of summary judgment to cast doubt on the adverse employment record established by the large volume of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was not the actual reason and that the employer intentionally discriminated against the employee on the basis of”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.