Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

853 F.2d 927

Docket Nos. 87-3267, 87-3536.

United States v. Mango

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-08-10

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on White v. White

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-08-10

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Before KEITH, KENNEDY and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Defendant-appellant, Vito Earl Mango, appeals from his jury conviction for conspiracy to sell counterfeit notes and the sale and passing of such notes in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sections 371, 472 and 473. After careful consideration of the briefs, record and oral argument, we AFFIRM based on Judge Joseph Kinneary's opinion.

/853/f2d/927 · .json · Public domain