Davis v. White’s Empirical Analysis
858 F.3d 1155 · 2017
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Snyder v. Louisiana · Rice v. Collins · Quigley v. Winter · United States v. Battle · Morris v. Union Pacific Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]videntiary rulings are reversed only for 'a clear and prejudicial abuse of discretion.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Federal Rule of Evidence 403 allows a district court to exclude evidence 'if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of ... unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]here evidence does not have a substantial influence on the verdict because it is cumulative, there is no prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.