Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 F.3d 1148

Docket No. 96-6116.

Brock v. Angelone

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: May 16, 1996. Decided: May 21, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-05-21

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Dove v. Codesco · James F. Bauer v. United States

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-05-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-95-1194-2)

Robert Lee Brock, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59 motion. Both orders are properly before the court. Dove v. CODESCO, 569 F.2d 807, 810 (4th Cir.1978). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brock v. Angelone, No. CA-95-1194-2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 28, 1995; Jan. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/86/f3d/1148 · .json · Public domain