Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 F.3d 1150

Docket No. 95-3100.

Holt v. Kalimi

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1996. Decided May 28, 1996.

This page is marked noindex.

Relies on Gary v. Clifton

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-05-28

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-95-355).

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Curtis Holt, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. David Lee Ross, Jean Freeman Reed, VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Holt v. Kalimi, No. CA-95-355 (E.D.Va. Nov. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/86/f3d/1150 · .json · Public domain