Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 86 F.3d 193 - Kornblau v. Dade County

Kornblau v. Dade County’s Empirical Analysis

86 F.3d 193 · 1996

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently November 2020 · most notably Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Total System Services, Inc. (2000), Fortyune v. American Multi-Cinema, Inc. (2004)

14 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

2001996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990) · 42 U.S.C. § 12132 (§ 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)

Relies on Voinovich v. Quilter · Gonzalez v. McNary · Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Helen L. v. DiDario · Parker v. Bowen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is defined in 42 U.S.C. § 12131 (2) as . . . an individual with a disability who, with or without reasonable modifications to rules, policies, or practices, the removal of architectural, communication, or transportation barriers, or the provision of auxiliary aids and services, meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of services or the participation in programs or activities provided by a public entity. It is the plaintiff's burden to show his disability, the denial of a public benefit, and that such”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]he ADA was enacted to provide a national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against individuals with disabilities ... and must be broadly construed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The purpose of the [Americans with Disabilities Act] is to place those with disabilities on an equal footing, not to give them an unfair advantage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.