Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

86 N.J. Eq. 257

Smith v. Runkle

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 19, 1916

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1916-06-19

<p>On appeals from a decree of the prerogative court, reported in 97 Atl. Rep. £96.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1916-06-19

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 1985

11 state decisions

5019161920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The decree of the prerogative court, affirming the decree, of the orphans court of Essex county, admitting to probate the *258last will and testament and codicil thereto of William Runkle, deceased, in the form therein expressed and adjudged, is in all things affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Judge Martin, filed in the orphans court of Essex county.

¶2This is the case which is designated in the record as admitting to probate the first and second pages in one-half sheet of legal cap paper, as part of the will and codicil.

¶3For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Gaerison, Swayze, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Heppeni-ieimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner — 14.

¶4For reversal — Hone.

/86/njeq/257 · .json · Public domain