Thompson v. Katzer’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently February 2011
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 124 Wash. 2d 121 - Tincani v. Inland Empire Zoological Society · State in Interest of JRT v. Timperly · 93 Wash. 2d 127 - Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc. · 106 Wash. 2d 658 - Younce v. Ferguson · Iwai v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“between the two. Thompson was acting without promise of remuneration, except for Berg's promise to pay for gas which, like the $4 in Younce and the firewood in Swanson, was merely incidental to a purpose that was primary familial or social. Because Thompson did not enter the Katzers' land for any purpose directly or indirectly connected with”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Katzer“[12] or if the benefit is merely incidental to an entry that is primarily familial or social. [13] If the law were otherwise, every guest who brings a bottle of wine to the host of a residential dinner party would be a”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Katzer“enters the occupier's premises with the occupier's permission or tolerance, either (a) without an invitation or (b) with an invitation but for a purpose unrelated to any business dealings between the two. [9] The term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Thompson v. Katzer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.