State v. Cabututan’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2023
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Ake v. Oklahoma · State v. Tillman · State v. Brown · State v. Frame
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`There is a presumption as to the correctness of the trial judge's ruling in the absence of a demonstration to the contrary, and that decision will not be upset absent a clear abuse of discretion.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“It is within the discretion of the trial court whether to allow jurors to view a crime scene and that decision will not be reversed unless the trial court has clearly abused that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is distinctly impracticable and inefficient to present the material elements ... by photographs, diagrams, maps, measurements, and the like.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.