Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

864 A.2d 1201

Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 2004

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2004-12-29

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on Commonwealth v. Grant · Commonwealth v. Sexton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2004, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED. Pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grant, 572 Pa. 48, 813 A.2d 726 (2002), petitioner’s ineffectiveness claim pertaining to trial counsel’s failure to pursue a jury charge cautioning the jury that he was denied the opportunity for an objective identification at a pretrial line-up under Commonwealth v. Sexton, 485 Pa. 17, 400 A.2d 1289 (1979), is dismissed without prejudice until collateral review. Jurisdiction relinquished.

/864/a2d/1201 · .json · Public domain