Coleman v. Duke’s Empirical Analysis
867 F.3d 204 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 633A (§ 15 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Morgan · Woodford v. Ngo · Baloch v. Kempthorne · Bowden v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To start the administrative process, an employee must contact an [EEO] [c]ounselor at [her] employing agency with 45 days of the alleged discriminatory conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the facts in the record and all reasonable inferences derived therefrom in the light most favorable”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“federal employees must administratively exhaust their claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.