Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

868 A.2d 1201

Kessler v. Broder

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 2005

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · decided 2005-02-18

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2016

11 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-02-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

HOWARD B. KESSLER, M.D., ANDREW H. SHAER, M.D. AND LOCKE W. BARBER, D.O.
v.
GEORGE J. BRODER, M.D., MICHAEL R. CLAIR, M.D., WILLIAM H. HARTZ, M.D., PHILIP J. MODOFSKY, M.D., JAY S. ROSENBLUM, M.D., DELAWARE OPEN MRI RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.A., GENERAL PARTNER OF DELAWARE OPEN MRI, L.L.C. AND DELAWARE OPEN MRI II, L.L.C., COUNTY LINE OPEN MRI, INC., GENERAL PARTNER OF PENNSYLVANIA OPEN MRI AT COUNTY LINE PLAZA, L.P., AND PENNSYLVANIA OPEN MRI AT ROOSEVELT PLAZA, L.P., ANDORRA OPEN MRI, INC., GENERAL PARTNER OF ANDORRA OPEN MRI, L.P., AND JEANES RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, P.C., AND ITS UNINCORPORATED DIVISION, PENNSYLVANIA OPEN MRI AT GRANT PLAZA,
PETITION OF: GEORGE J. BRODER, M.D., MICHAEL R. CLAIR, M.D., WILLIAM H. HARTZ, MOLDOFSKY & ROSENBLUM.

¶1Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District.

February 18, 2005.

¶2

ORDER

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4AND NOW, this 18th day of February, 2005, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby DENIED.

/868/a2d/1201 · .json · Public domain