Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 CAL 134 - McMenomy v. Baud

McMenomy v. Baud’s Empirical Analysis

1890

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
6
states following
January 1973
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 1973

21 state decisions

60189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sullivan v. Royer · Tuebner v. Cal. St. R.R. · Carson v. Cent. R.R. · Brown v. Kentfield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Therefore, where the injurious effects complained of may be prevented without abating or enjoining the works or the operation thereof entirely, only the causes of the specific injurious effects proved should be enjoined. If, for example, the cause be the production and escape of smoke and soot in such a way as that they penetrate plaintiff’s premises to his injury, the remedy by injunction should be restricted to this specific injury, and leave the defendant at liberty to operate his works, if he can, and elects to do so, in such a manner as to remove the cause and prevent the injury.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.