Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 F.3d 1310

Docket No. 96-6131.

Whaley v. Beshears

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted May 16, 1996. Decided June 5, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-06-05

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Yarborough v. Lofton

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-06-05

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-95-3965-S).

Samuel Whaley, William Black, Robert Chadwick, Ivan Turner, Robert Repovich, Appellants Pro Se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Whaley v. Beshears, No. CA-95-3965-S (D.Md. Jan. 4, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/87/f3d/1310 · .json · Public domain