Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 87 ME 324 - Phillips v. Phillips

Phillips v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

1895

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
6
states following
June 1953
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1953

7 state decisions

201895190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sweeney v. Muldoon · Trueman v. Tilden

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The necessity of a decent burial arises immediately after the decease, and the law, both ancient and modern, pledges the credit of the estate for the payment of such reasonable sums as may be necessary for that purpose, even though such expenses may have been incurred after the death and before the appointment of an administrator.” (by way of defense — reimbursement by third party from estate) ;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.