Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

87 N.J. Eq. 370

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 5, 1917

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1917-03-05

•On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Backes, who filed the following opinion:. ■ “This ig a bill for the specific performance of a contract to convey land. The parties to the suit are brothers.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 1860

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1917-03-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Baekes.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenohard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, ' Kaliscii, Black, White, Hepreni-ieimer, Williams, Gardner—13.For reversal—None.
/87/njeq/370 · .json · Public domain