Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 871 F.2d 612 - Conrad v. Robinson

Conrad v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

871 F.2d 612 · 1989

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
June 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2015

5 federal appellate ·

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1443 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447 · 42 U.S.C. § 1971 (Civil Rights Act of 1957) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Georgia v. Rachel · City of Greenwood v. Peacock · Johnson v. Mississippi · Fox v. Eaton Corp. · Jones v. General Tire & Rubber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “connection between Robinson's speech and this protected activity [the filing of the suit] is very close.... Had Robinson's comments in the Plain Dealer been unrelated to his pre-existing federal court case against [the union], but were just general allegations that Conrad discriminated on the basis of race, the result might be very different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.