Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

878 So. 2d 423

Bedwell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2004-06-23

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently February 2005

1 state decisions

Relies on 689 So. 2d 235 - State v. Leroux · Kot v. Holmberg

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-06-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Brian J. Bedwell challenges the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We reverse and remand for further review on one point.

¶2Having reviewed the motion, the state’s responses, and the records provided, we hold that the plea colloquy and forms do not conclusively refute Bedwell’s claim of misadvice associated with his entitlement to gain time. See Griffin v. State, 869 So.2d 773 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004); see also State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996).

¶3Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s ruling and remand for the trial court to *424conduct an evidentiary hearing to address the merits of BedwelFs claim.

STEVENSON, GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
/878/so2d/423 · .json · Public domain