Doris Lapham v. Walgreen Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2023
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Florida Middle District Court)
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 2615 (§ 105 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 29 U.S.C. § 2654 (§ 404 of the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 704 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. · National Labor Relations Board v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.