Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

88 N.J.L. 389

State v. Gargare

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 15, 1915

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1915-10-15

, a Ford automobile belonging to Herbert I. Davis. The case comes up under the one hundred and thirty-sixth section of the Criminal Procedure act. “The first contention is that there was error in the refusal of the motion to quash. The only ground upon which the motion was based was that the indictment failed to state that the automobile was of any value.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1915-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently December 1970

3 district · 3 state decisions

301915192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2*391For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Vredenburgh, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.

¶3For reversal—None.

/88/njl/389 · .json · Public domain