Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

88 N.J.L. 394

State v. Lodico

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided October 15, 1915

Supreme Court of New Jersey · decided 1915-10-15

On error to the Supreme Court, in which court the following per curiam was filed: “The defendant was indicted and convicted of the crime of subornation of perjury, alleged to have been committed in inducing one Maria Diano to swear falsely in a suit brought by her against the Public Service Railway Company to recover the pecuniary loss sustained by her next of kin through the death of her son Diego. “It is first contended that there was no sufficient legal proof to support…

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1915-10-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1930

3 state decisions

10191519201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The judgment under review should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

¶2For affirmance—The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenciiard, Parker, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Vredenbubgh, IIeppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, JJ. 11.

¶3For reversal—None.

/88/njl/394 · .json · Public domain